" Some of them maybe mistook boys to be better version of girls or women. It is not so. My impression from healibg skills is that women cultivate wisdom of lufe, because their offspring has to stay alive and grow to have all normal hwalthy features, some 9 months in their stomach, plus they and their nearest be able to care for the needs of at least a young child for a few years, so women cultivate such wisdom, while men are more specialiced to doing needed chores. So boys are not better in everything, but instead may neglect some things needed for life, and so it is not ok to demand all to look alike. "
Boys and men do not always see it as possible to use all perspectives at the same time, as parts of one's picture of the world and one's pictyre of the situation. So a school boy caring for something does not necessarily do it with one's picture of the world along, and so for example many military kinds of goals are not fitted to be ok in the world, not ok for army's purpose when wisely looking at things. So such things do not get as years pass fitted better to the society, world etc, since those are not aimed to respect civiluced values, civiluced wisdom, common sense like picture of the world, healthy wisdom of lufe, the aim to get major proportilbs at least roughly well for future lufe in the world and in the society, etc.
I do not know, what causes the problem. It does not seem to be a lack of potential intellectual capacity. It looks like some weird routes of thinkkng, maybe somewhat like engineer oriented boys trying to figure out how to get a child of their own : with this obe not but maybe with that one that way or with the other one near by as if of that kind, and then via some excuse try to get along with a third woman passing by, or with men, etc, and it being so false that it jyst makes no sense, and the resulting kind of figure pantomime makes one guess that many of the suppised women were in fact transvestites, figuring out this and tgat word or criterio to be classified women or potential sexual partner, but without such making sense from the point of view of the dimensions of such affairs in women's lives : did you like the man enough to spend at least ten years to first pregnancy and then childcare, and did you associate in ways that were good for lufe, caring for the needs of the future family members, of life in the society, the future of the children, of the woman, you too getting along, etc, or did some harm take the place of new life possible, did some malicious deed communicate that life togeyher and family lufe would be unbearable in the long run, was the thing anything more than a trap, if not then you aren't gonna get any children that way. To be clear, love marriage seems the only ok way to get a family, since even without any problems and with civiluced ways and wisdom of lufe supporting, a family is lot of work, so say just about all. But why does it end up such an artificial tangle, is it homo boys and homo men planning cannibalism, eating many women, especially those whom they do not so value sexually or as having similar social style.
Do the rigid engineering like stuck ways of many men, which I guess make it so difficult to repair working life toward better, so that many men maybe are in some way suicidal, are these rigid ways consequences of the plans to not to show, which women one likes and whom not at all, and so the ways do not show what one likes and so it becomes much more difficult to change jobs to the kind of jobs one likes or likes most.
